Agent Review Data
Ranked #8 of 20 air fryers · evidence checked 29 Jul 2026, 18:17 BST
Ninja MAX Dual Zone Air Fryer product imageNinja UK product page · source-hosted
Air fryers / Ninja / DZ400UKCYD

Ninja MAX 6-in-1 Dual Zone Air Fryer 9.5L – Cyber Space DZ400UKCYD

Ninja MAX Dual Zone Air Fryer exact UK model, compared using published specifications, a timestamped source offer and claim-level evidence limits.

Capacity
9.5 L
source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
Published power
2,470 W
source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
Cooking zones
2
source ↗ · checked 29 Jul

Primary limitation: Published specifications are not Agent Review Data laboratory measurements.

Decision scopeEligible for ranked comparison
Purchase adviceNot currently supported

Rank #8 compares published inputs inside one category. It is not a reviewed instruction to buy this product.

Candidate-set and method sensitivity are now retained for this leading cohort. They do not satisfy the missing evidence or human review gates.

  • independent exact model evidence missing
  • controlled measurement missing
  • safety not structured
  • claim level trace missing
Specification score67.9/ 100
Category rank#8Ranked
Owner evidenceNot recorded0 unique pools
Checked offer£229.99out of stock
Inspect evidence Check retailer listing £229.99 · out of stock · checked 18:17 · direct non-affiliate link
The short answer

Specification rank #8 among air fryers: capacity 9.5 L; published power 2,470 W. Published inputs, not our lab test.

Published comparison inputs

Capacity
9.5 L
source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
Published power
2,470 W
source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
Cooking zones
2
source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
Checked price
£229.99
retailer ↗ · checked 29 Jul

Published features

Dual zone

Why it scored 67.9

Value at checked price28% weight
52.07869907387278

Score uses the exact model's published specification and checked offer; it is not a laboratory result.

Published capacity20% weight
87.25

Score uses the exact model's published specification and checked offer; it is not a laboratory result.

Cooking flexibility24% weight
82

Unknown binary feature inputs receive the method's neutral half-credit, rather than being asserted present or absent.

Convenience features16% weight
62

Unknown binary feature inputs receive the method's neutral half-credit, rather than being asserted present or absent.

Evidence coverage12% weight
52

Baseline exact-model source linkage only. Third-party URL reachability does not increase product score.

Evidence profile

Coverage, sensitivity and open gaps

Open readiness JSON ↗
Baseline rank#8

Inside the published category method.

Stress-test range#3–#8

Across 15 factor-removal and weight-change scenarios.

Purchase adviceBlocked

6 blocking gaps remain.

Official sourceRetained
Independent editorial0
Owner pools0
Retailer observations1/2
Controlled measurements0
Human second reviewNot completed
Decision cruxes and buying constraints
Decision cruxes
Cooking evenness

Published capacity and modes do not establish like-for-like cooking evenness or browning.

Usable capacity and cleaning

Nominal litres do not fully describe practical food area, batch size or cleaning effort.

Buying constraints
Warranty
Not structured
Returns
not structured
Safety
not structured
Installation or setup
not structured
Normalized decision receipt

7 mapped fields each carry a canonical receipt hash and an origin status. Source access time is kept separate from field observation, so a configured value is not presented as freshly re-extracted.

sha256:38a8b2458a792b358c0888e3bea2dc8ce81c608bf479593ed1b544f6759ed7e8

Evidence limitations

  • Published specifications are not Agent Review Data laboratory measurements.
  • The manufacturer-direct source offer and availability can change after the checked time.
  • Exact model identity is keyed to the model/SKU in the source register; related colours and bundles are not merged.

Recommendation caveats

  • The score compares published specifications and a checked offer; it is not a controlled performance test.
  • Scores are comparable only within this category.
  • Published CADR bases can differ by pollutant and test disclosure; the raw basis remains visible.
  • No separate third-party source passed the exact-model URL check at refresh.

Owner feedback across the web

No trustworthy exact-model owner-review pool was captured on the source page.

No exact-model review pool passed the current inclusion check.

Independent tests and owner discussion

No separate third-party source passed the exact-model check at this refresh.

No separate editorial, owner-pool or Reddit source passed the exact-model check at the last refresh.
  • No separate editorial, owner-pool or Reddit source was captured for this exact model.
Claim-level trace not yet modelled · 2 of 160 available

This record exposes source-linked inputs and their provenance status, but it does not yet model individual claims, relations and criterion contributions.

Inspect the trace build-out →

Sources

Exact product source and offer observationNinja UK ↗