Home cleaning / floor care

Cordless vacuums reviews

Our top picks, based on independent reviews and testing.

3 reviewed · 7 review sources
Review verdicts

Top picks

Independent reviews and tests, distilled into one clear order.

About these picks

Two Shark models take first and second in the all-round order, while Gtech AirRAM 3 is third with a clear floor-only specialist label. Pickup, handling, hair management, runtime under real settings and maintenance lead the judgement. Use observed hard-floor and carpet pickup, pet hair and edge cleaning, push and pull effort, steering, bin and filter maintenance, useful runtime and attachment reach. Claimed suction and maximum runtime do not decide quality. Price, stock, retailer and affiliate data are excluded from quality judgement. Read the method ↗ Get the JSON ↗

  • #1Top pick
    Top all-round group
    Shark PowerDetect Clean & Empty Cordless Pet Vacuum product imageMixed floors and pet hair

    Shark PowerDetect Clean & Empty Cordless Pet Vacuum Cleaner IP3251UKT

    IP3251UKT

    Product score76.1/100Category-specific technical score

    Strong measured and home-use cleaning, capable automatic adjustment and a useful emptying dock put this in the leading all-round group. Carpet back-pull effort and dock bulk stop it being a universal first choice.

    Read review details

    What reviewers liked

    • Excellent pickup across floor types in testing
    • Strong pet-hair and edge performance
    • Automatic floor and edge detection
    • Clean-and-empty dock reduces routine bin contact

    Things to consider

    • Floorhead can require substantial effort when pulled back on carpet
    • Dock is bulky
    • Heavier and more complex than a simple floor cleaner

    Trusted-site sense check: A leading full-system vacuum for mixed homes. Its first place is a close editorial judgement, with handling effort retained as a material caveat.

    Exact-model review and test sources

    Retailer listingView retailer listing at Shark UK
  • #2
    Top proven all-round group
    Shark Stratos Anti Hair Wrap Plus Pet Pro Cordless Vacuum product imageLonger cleaning sessions

    Shark Stratos Anti Hair Wrap Plus Pet Pro Cordless Vacuum [Double Battery] IZ420UKT

    IZ420UKT

    Product score79/100Category-specific technical score

    Independent long-form use supports strong pickup, pet-hair handling and unusually flexible runtime from two batteries. Its small bin, lack of a freestanding park position and older design trade off against that proven performance.

    Read review details

    What reviewers liked

    • Strong everyday hard-floor and carpet cleaning
    • Effective anti-hair-wrap system
    • Two removable batteries extend useful cleaning time
    • Flexible wand improves reach under furniture

    Things to consider

    • Small bin requires frequent emptying
    • Does not stand securely on its own
    • No automatic emptying dock
    • Bulky in handheld use

    Trusted-site sense check: A mature and well-tested alternative to the newer PowerDetect, especially where two-battery runtime matters.

    Exact-model review and test sources

    Retailer listingView retailer listing at John Lewis
  • #3
    Floor and edge specialist
    Gtech AirRAM 3 product imageFast floor-only cleaning

    AirRAM 3 Dual Edge-Clean Cordless Vacuum

    1-03-270

    Product score64.1/100Category-specific technical score

    Reviewers consistently find the AirRAM 3 strong and easy to steer on floors, with excellent edge reach. It is third overall and clearly labelled as a floor specialist because it cannot replace a full stick system for stairs, furniture or above-floor work.

    Read review details

    What reviewers liked

    • Strong floor and edge pickup
    • Light, simple upright handling
    • Effective dual-edge design
    • Straightforward bin emptying

    Things to consider

    • No handheld conversion
    • No hose or accessory system
    • Unsuitable for stairs and above-floor cleaning
    • Roughly 30-minute runtime is modest

    Trusted-site sense check: Excellent within its floor-cleaning job, incomplete as the only vacuum for many homes.

    Exact-model review and test sources

    Retailer listingView retailer listing at Gtech UK
17 more products and category gaps

IP3251UKT and IZ420UKT have enough exact evidence for a close first and second. AirRAM 3 Dual Edge is third overall and clearly labelled for the different floor-focused job it serves.

Tracked products without a publishable review result

Whole-market context missing from the tracked catalogue

  • Broader premium cordless marketWhole-market all-round vacuums

    The tracked catalogue contains only Shark and Gtech. Current tested guides also feature Dyson, Samsung, LG, Henry and Miele designs, so the top two cannot be read as a whole-market verdict.

    Evidence 1Evidence 2
About the shortlist

The review cohort contains two Shark all-rounders and one Gtech specialist. Test debris, carpet type and power modes differ by publication. Runtime claims are not compared without the power setting and floor context. Seventeen tracked models remain outside the exact review cohort. Inspect the technical product table ↗

More product data

All 20 products

20 products
  1. Published run time
    120 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Weight
    Not comparable
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#1–#7
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers1 / 1 / 2
    Primary evidence gapNo Agent Review Data controlled measurement cohort exists for this category.
  2. Published run time
    70 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#1–#6
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  3. Published run time
    60 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#2–#8
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  4. Published run time
    50 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#1–#10
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  5. Published run time
    60 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#2–#6
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  6. Published run time
    60 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#3–#12
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  7. Published run time
    50 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#4–#9
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  8. Published run time
    70 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#3–#10
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers1 / 1 / 2
    Primary evidence gapNo Agent Review Data controlled measurement cohort exists for this category.
  9. Published run time
    60 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#4–#11
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  10. Published run time
    70 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#6–#14
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  11. Published run time
    50 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#8–#13
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  12. Published run time
    60 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#9–#16
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  13. Published run time
    50 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Weight
    Not comparable
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#9–#19
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers1 / 1 / 2
    Primary evidence gapNo Agent Review Data controlled measurement cohort exists for this category.
  14. Published run time
    40 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#12–#16
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 1 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  15. Published run time
    60 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#13–#20
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  16. Published run time
    40 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#12–#17
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 1 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  17. Published run time
    30 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#11–#20
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 0 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  18. Published run time
    40 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Weight
    Not comparable
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#14–#20
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 1 / 2
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  19. Published run time
    40 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#17–#19
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 1 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.
  20. Published run time
    40 min
    source ↗ · checked 29 Jul
    Stress-test rank#17–#20
    Mapped inputs65 configured, not re-extracted
    Independent / owner / offers0 / 1 / 1
    Primary evidence gapNo exact-model independent editorial test is retained.