Technical comparison
Specification contextSpecification rank #20 among portable air conditioners: claimed room up to 28 m²; cooling 9,000 BTU. Published inputs, not our lab test.
Published comparison inputs
Published features
Why the specification score is 62.4
20.5 published BTU per £1 at the checked price.
65 dB comparison input; measurement conditions may differ.
2.6 claimed capacity/input COP proxy; not independently measured.
Published features: Wi-Fi, window kit. Unknown binary inputs receive neutral half-credit.
2 exact-model sources; 1 unique review pools.
Evidence report
What matters, what we know and what is missing
This is a specification-ranked comparison report, not purchase advice. It uses the category evidence profile below and keeps hands-on findings separate from the published specification score.
Observed cooling under disclosed room, heat-load, ambient-temperature and run-time conditions.
No exact-model hands-on synthesis is published. This report covers sourced comparison inputs, coverage and open gaps; it makes no claim about real-world performance beyond retained sources.
Inside the bounded published category method.
Across 15 factor-removal and weight-change scenarios.
6 blocking gaps remain.
Category evidence needs, decision cruxes and constraints
Observed cooling under disclosed room, heat-load, ambient-temperature and run-time conditions.
Hands-on state: not collectedMeasured or directly observed noise with mode, distance and room context.
Hands-on state: not collectedHands-on installation evidence for the supplied kit, hose and relevant window type.
Hands-on state: not collectedObserved drainage behaviour in cooling and dehumidifying use.
Hands-on state: not collectedMeasured consumption tied to mode and delivered cooling, not nameplate input alone.
Hands-on state: not collectedDirect evidence on weight, wheels, handles, hose storage and movement between rooms.
Hands-on state: not collectedHands-on overnight context covering noise, light, cycling and temperature control.
Hands-on state: not collectedHands-on gate: Use two independent exact-model hands-on sources, or one transparent controlled test that discloses room, installation and measurement conditions.
Published BTU and room claims do not establish cooling under a shared room, heat-load and energy protocol.
Published noise values may use different modes and conditions; compressor-state measurements are missing.
- Warranty
- 2 yearssource ↗
- Returns
- not structured
- Safety
- not structured
- Installation or setup
- A window kit is listed as included.
Normalized decision receipt
11 mapped fields each carry a canonical receipt hash and an origin status. Source access time is kept separate from field observation, so a configured value is not presented as freshly re-extracted.
sha256:b9cf5d597426ceef40167c60fc697480ede20e0f18f7c3928ae38dc02895d4f9The score and rank compare retained specification inputs inside this bounded category cohort. They are not a hands-on quality verdict and are not comparable across categories. Open evidence gaps block purchase advice regardless of specification score, rank, offer state or review-synthesis verdict.
Source notes and limitations
Evidence limitations
- No controlled laboratory cooling result is used unless explicitly linked.
- Room coverage, noise and power are published specifications, not Agent Review Data measurements.
- The tracked offer can change after its checked time.
Recommendation caveats
- Ranking compares published specifications and checked price; it is not a laboratory test.
- The tracked offer was out of stock when checked.
- Owner-feedback coverage is too narrow for an internet-wide consensus claim.
Owner feedback across the web
One exact-model review pool is visible. It is trust-adjusted and not presented as internet-wide consensus.
One exact-model commercial review pool. It is pulled toward neutral and is not presented as internet-wide consensus.
Inspect review pool ↗Independent tests and owner discussion
No separate third-party source passed the exact-model check at this refresh.
- No separate editorial, owner-pool or Reddit source was captured for this exact model.
Claim-level trace not yet modelled · 2 of 160 available
This record exposes source-linked inputs and their provenance status, but it does not yet model individual claims, relations and criterion contributions.
Inspect the trace build-out →