Technical comparison
Specification contextSpecification rank #11 among power banks: nameplate capacity 10,000 mAh; maximum output 30 W. Published inputs, not our lab test.
Published comparison inputs
Published features
Why the specification score is 61.2
250.1 mAh and 0.8 published watts per £1 at the checked price.
30 W published maximum; sustained and multi-port limits may differ.
10,000 mAh nameplate capacity; delivered Wh is not measured.
Published features: built-in cable. Unverified convenience fields receive neutral half-credit rather than being asserted absent.
Exact manufacturer product page, SKU and GTIN; 1 review pools.
Evidence report
What matters, what we know and what is missing
This is a specification-ranked comparison report, not purchase advice. It uses the category evidence profile below and keeps hands-on findings separate from the published specification score.
Controlled delivered-energy testing with voltage, protocol and termination conditions.
No exact-model hands-on synthesis is published. This report covers sourced comparison inputs, coverage and open gaps; it makes no claim about real-world performance beyond retained sources.
Inside the bounded published category method.
Across 15 factor-removal and weight-change scenarios.
6 blocking gaps remain.
Category evidence needs, decision cruxes and constraints
Controlled delivered-energy testing with voltage, protocol and termination conditions.
Hands-on state: not collectedMeasured sustained output and verified charging-protocol negotiation by port.
Hands-on state: not collectedTimed recharge using a disclosed charger, cable and input protocol.
Hands-on state: not collectedObserved or measured temperature under sustained charging and discharging.
Hands-on state: not collectedDirect compatibility and power-allocation testing while input and output are active.
Hands-on state: not collectedVerified weight, dimensions, cable design and hands-on carrying context.
Hands-on state: not collectedDirect charging tests with named devices, ports, cables and negotiated protocols.
Hands-on state: not collectedHands-on gate: Resolve the exact SKU and cell configuration. Performance claims require controlled delivered-energy or output measurements; otherwise report nameplate values only.
Nameplate capacity does not establish usable delivered energy at a stated voltage and load.
Peak output does not establish sustained multi-port power, temperature or cycle-life performance.
- Warranty
- Not structured
- Returns
- not structured
- Safety
- not structured
- Installation or setup
- not structured
Normalized decision receipt
9 mapped fields each carry a canonical receipt hash and an origin status. Source access time is kept separate from field observation, so a configured value is not presented as freshly re-extracted.
sha256:78e8dc1babb74f102ddd74b2d12aae3439ec852268639bec257a3aafb5de0c58The score and rank compare retained specification inputs inside this bounded category cohort. They are not a hands-on quality verdict and are not comparable across categories. Open evidence gaps block purchase advice regardless of specification score, rank, offer state or review-synthesis verdict.
Source notes and limitations
Evidence limitations
- Capacity is nameplate mAh, not independently measured delivered energy.
- Maximum output is a published boundary condition; sustained and shared-port output can differ.
- No calibrated discharge, thermal or cycle-life test is claimed by Agent Review Data.
- The manufacturer-direct offer can change after its checked time.
Recommendation caveats
- Ranking compares manufacturer specifications and checked price; it is not a discharge or thermal test.
- The manufacturer-direct offer was in stock when checked.
- Nameplate mAh is not the energy delivered to a device after voltage conversion losses.
- Owner-feedback coverage is too narrow for an internet-wide consensus claim.
Owner feedback across the web
One exact-model review pool is visible. It is trust-adjusted and not presented as internet-wide consensus.
One exact-model commercial review pool. It is pulled toward neutral and is not presented as internet-wide consensus.
Inspect review pool ↗Independent tests and owner discussion
No separate third-party source passed the exact-model check at this refresh.
- No separate editorial, owner-pool or Reddit source was captured for this exact model.
Claim-level trace not yet modelled · 2 of 160 available
This record exposes source-linked inputs and their provenance status, but it does not yet model individual claims, relations and criterion contributions.
Inspect the trace build-out →